Tag Archives: news

From Iran to Ireland: How the Oil Shock Is Hitting Home

By Joey Kennedy

The price on the petrol pump is not supposed to tell a geopolitical story, but right now it does. Every jump past €2 per litre is not just a number, it is a signal. A signal that a conflict involving Iran, thousands of kilometres away, is already working its way into Irish households. For most people, it shows up quietly at first. An extra €20 here, €50 there, and suddenly a monthly budget that no longer quite works. What looks like a distant war has quickly become something much closer, a global oil shock that has already reached Ireland. 

This shock does not begin in Dublin or Brussels. It begins in one of the most strategically important stretches of water in the world, the Strait of Hormuz. Running along Iran’s southern border, this narrow passage carries roughly a fifth of global oil supply. When tensions escalate, as they have in recent weeks, the risk is not theoretical. Any disruption, or even the threat of it, is enough to tighten supply expectations and push prices higher. 

Markets do not wait for a full shutdown. The possibility alone is enough. When traders see Iranian involvement putting such a critical supply route at risk, they react immediately. That is why oil prices have surged so quickly. And this time, the system is more fragile than it looks. Venezuelan output, which could normally act as a stabilising force, remains constrained by US sanctions. Without that buffer, the shock from Iran is not absorbed. It is amplified. 

For Ireland, none of this stays abstract for long. Oil is priced globally, so Irish consumers and firms face the same marginal price regardless of where supply originates. As a net energy importer, that creates a clear vulnerability. When prices rise because of conflict involving Iran, it is not just a global issue. It is a direct transfer of income out of the Irish economy, money that would otherwise be spent locally now flowing abroad to cover higher energy costs. 

That impact is already visible. Fuel prices have climbed back above €2 per litre, while heating oil has jumped sharply in a matter of weeks. For households, this is not marginal. It is a squeeze that forces trade offs, less spending elsewhere, tighter budgets, and a noticeable drop in financial breathing room. What begins as a reaction to events in Iran quickly becomes a change in how money is spent across the entire month. 

The deeper issue is how quickly this spreads. Oil does not just power cars, it underpins the entire economy. When the Iran-driven shock pushes fuel costs higher, transport becomes more expensive, and  those costs ripple outward. They show up in places people do not immediately connect to geopolitics, until the weekly shop feels different and everyday spending starts to creep up. What began as a conflict driven supply shock turns into broader inflation, moving quietly through supply chains before becoming impossible to ignore. 

That is where the pressure builds. Households pull back first, particularly on discretionary spending. Retail and hospitality feel it quickly as people cut back on non-essential purchases. Businesses, meanwhile, are caught in the middle. Costs rise because of higher energy prices linked to the Iran conflict, but passing those costs on is not always possible. In competitive sectors, margins take the hit. Profitability weakens, and decisions begin to shift. Investment is delayed, hiring slows, and expansion plans are quietly put on hold. What started with geopolitical tension now feeds directly into slower economic growth. 

There is also a quieter problem developing underneath all of this. Irish firms compete globally, often against businesses in energy-producing economies like the United States. When energy costs rise in Ireland due to global shocks triggered by Iran, that gap matters. It makes Irish operations relatively more expensive and, over time, erodes competitiveness. 

At the macro level, the pattern is familiar but still dangerous. Inflation moves higher as energy costs filter through the system, while growth slows as spending and investment weaken. This is exactly the type of environment policymakers worry about. It leaves central banks in a bind. Cutting interest rates risks fuelling inflation further, while keeping them high extends the pressure already being felt across the economy. 

Ireland is not entering this from a weak position. Growth has been strong and public finances are relatively solid. But that does not remove the exposure. With the economy already running close to capacity, an externally driven shock, like one tied to Iran’s disruption of global oil flows, risks feeding  into wages and creating a broader cycle that is harder to control once it begins. 

What happens next depends largely on how the conflict involving Iran evolves. If tensions ease and supply stabilises, oil prices could fall back relatively quickly, and the pressure on households would begin  to ease. But if disruption continues, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz, the consequences become more lasting. Higher energy costs become embedded, inflation lingers, and the squeeze on both households and businesses does not go away. 

That is the real takeaway. This is not just about oil; it is about exposure. Ireland cannot insulate itself  from shocks like this. When Iran threatens a route that carries a fifth of the world’s oil, the effects do not  stay in the Gulf. They move through markets, through prices, and into everyday life. 

And that is what makes this different from a normal price spike. It starts with a geopolitical flashpoint involving Iran, but it does not end there. It shows up quietly at first, at the pump, on a heating bill, in a slightly more expensive weekly shop. Then it spreads. By the time it becomes a headline at home, it is already part of everyday life.

Irish Food in Japanese Kitchens: Ireland’s Agricultural Partnership with Japan

By Reece Hickey

In April 2025, Taoiseach Micheál Martin officially opened Ireland House Tokyo, the headquarters for Irish-Japanese trade and diplomacy in Japan. It houses the offices of various Irish organisations and state agencies such as the Irish Embassy, Bord Bia, Enterprise Ireland and IDA Ireland (Industrial Development Agency Ireland). The opening of Ireland House Tokyo has demonstrated the importance of the Japanese export market to Irish trade, particularly in the agricultural sector. 

Why do Japanese Consumers like Irish Food? 

Irish agricultural trade has become increasingly popular in Japan, with Japan now being the third largest consumer of Irish agri-food exports outside of Europe – Irish beef and pork, seafood, dairy and whiskey all highly sought after. In 2024 alone, €162 million worth of Irish food and drink products were exported to Japan. There are various reasons for this. 

Irish produce is considered among the highest quality in the world, particularly dairy and beef. Ireland’s mild and moist climate allows for a year-round grass-based agricultural system. This means that cows can graze on Ireland’s lush grass pastures for most of the year, making Ireland’s grass-fed meat and dairy especially flavourful and nutritious. 

Irish agri-food products are largely sustainably produced as well. Bord Bia has been a key player in recent years in ensuring that Irish produce is of high quality and is produced through environmentally sustainable means. This is done through auditing farms and food processing plants, as well as labelling their products with the Bord Bia Quality Assurance Mark. Irish produce carrying this mark indicates that it is safe, sustainably produced and fully traceable. 

These factors strongly appeal to Japanese consumers as they heavily prioritise the quality and freshness of their food. The aging population of Japan is also notably health-conscious and is willing to pay a premium price for high quality, safe and reliable food: a market niche well suited for Irish produce. 

The Success of Irish Food and Drink in the Japanese Market. 

One of the best performing Irish food exports in Japan has been beef offal (edible organs). Unlike in the Irish market, offal is a common sight on Japanese menus, with Irish beef tongue becoming quite a popular delicacy in Japan. One of the key customers for Irish beef tongue is restaurant chain “Negishi”, who sell it in over 40 restaurants across Japan, catering to approximately 100,000 customers each week. Last year, three high-end Japanese chefs were inducted into Bord Bia’s exclusive Chefs’ Irish Beef Club (CIBC). 

The CIBC is composed of chefs working in top restaurants and culinary institutions worldwide who share a passion for Irish beef. It already includes high-end chefs from across Europe and the Middle East. The CIBC has played a pivotal role in promoting Irish beef as a premium product in Japan. Inductee Chef Yuki Inoue, Head Chef at Ristorante La Bisboccia in Tokyo, said: “I’ve been using Irish beef at La Bisboccia for six years. We have served beef from all over the world, but Irish grass-fed beef stands up as the best, and our customers love it”. 

Irish whiskey brands such as Jameson, Redbreast and McConnell’s have also found success in Tokyo’s bars. In 2020, there were just 55,000 cases of Irish whiskey sold in Japan, a figure that has risen to more than 200,000 cases in 2024. The Irish Whiskey Association participated in a trade mission organised by the European Commission in Tokyo in June 2025. “Japan is a very exciting country for Irish whiskey, something that many companies are now discovering. There is a huge interest in the product, and a great affinity for Ireland”, said Eoin Ó Catháin, Director of the Irish Whiskey Association. 

Infrastructure, Legislation and Trade Missions – Groundwork for Success.

The Irish state purchased a site in Tokyo in 2017 for a centre of Irish trade and diplomacy, prior to the signing of the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement in 2019, which removed the majority of Japanese tariffs imposed on the EU. This site is now home to Ireland House Tokyo. With establishment costs totalling over €21 million, Ireland House Tokyo is the most expensive capital project the Irish state has ever invested in, outside of Ireland. This is justified, however, as bilateral trade between Ireland and Japan is now worth more than €21 billion per year and the volume of trade has doubled over the past decade. 

Accompanying the opening of this site was an extensive trade mission led by Bord Bia and Irish government ministers, which involved initiatives such as the aforementioned Chefs’ Irish Beef Club and participation in trade shows such as Foodex Japan, Japan’s biggest food and beverage exhibition. This trade mission established vital partnerships between Irish organisations and the Japanese agri-food sector. Another major part of the trade mission was Ireland’s participation at World Expo Osaka, where months of activities at the Expo were held to increase Ireland’s presence and visibility in Japan. 

2025 was a landmark year for the development of Irish-Japanese commerce. With key relationships built, crucial infrastructure constructed and vital trade agreements established, it is now time for Ireland to reap the benefits of its long-term investment in the Japanese market.

Black Economic Empowerment: South Africa’s Failed Attempt at Redress.

By Joseph Kennedy.

When Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) was introduced by the government, the promise of a new economic landscape came with it. Yet over thirty-five years after the official end to the country’s apartheid, South Africa remains one of the most divided societies in the world. Despite billions in business deals and endless government scorecards, inequality has barely shifted, unemployment has worsened, and a handful of connected elites have become the faces of the failed movement.

The Black Economic Empowerment movement emerged in the years after Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress party took office in 1994, when the new government inherited an economy completely divided by race. Apartheid had locked the Black majority out of ownership, skilled work, and corporate leadership. BEE was designed to be the economic counterpart to South Africa’s political liberation.

Formalized through the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act in 2003, the policy set out to expand ownership, provide employment opportunities, and grow a Black middle class that had been racially excluded for generations. In practice, this meant a corporate scorecard system that rewarded companies for Black ownership stakes, affirmative action in recruitment, and procurement from Black-run businesses.

These scorecards covered metrics including who sat on boards and executive teams, recruitment and promotion of black employees, money was invested in training and skills development, and trade with black-owned suppliers. Businesses could climb the BEE “levels” by hitting these targets, and a higher score made it easier to win government contracts or become a preferred supplier for large corporations.

From the government’s perspective, this mix of ownership transfers, hiring targets and skills investment was supposed to create a broad-based Black middle class and open pathways for new Black entrepreneurs. At its launch, BEE was promoted as the blueprint that would finally give Black South Africans a meaningful place in the economy they had long been cut out of.

So, what went wrong? The issue wasn’t the idea; it was how it was implemented. Rather than creating broader opportunities, the first wave of empowerment deals instead placed enormous quantities of wealth in the hands of a small group of politically connected elite. Billions of South African Rand in share transfers went to fewer than 100 people, according to governance researchers. As a result, most Black South Africans saw little change in income, employment, or mobility.

Companies often treated BEE as a compliance exercise, ticking boxes on ownership targets without building real ground skills or supporting new entrepreneurs. Procurement rules, designed to favor Black-owned suppliers, were frequently exploited through “fronting”, where businesses appointed Black partners on paper to secure contracts.

Once politics became involved, the trouble only deepened. Procurement around state-owned giants like Eskom and Transnet became crowded with well-connected government officials, inflating prices and driving the corruption crisis that later defined the state capture years. So as the wider economy stalled, the policy’s promise of change was replaced by rising frustration from a middle class that was supposed to be expanding, not shrinking.

In 2025, the impact of BEE’s failures is plain to be seen in South Africa’s economy. Inequality has barely shifted, with the average white household still earning more than four times the income of a Black household, according to Stats SA.

Unemployment tells the same story, where joblessness sits at around 37% for Black South Africans but falls to single digits for their white peers. The policy’s narrow focus on share deals and political insiders left millions without the skills, capital or mobility needed to break into the formal economy. On the ground, this has meant fewer new jobs, higher living costs, and a squeeze on families trying to climb into the middle class. South Africa is now left with the worst of both worlds; a transformation project that hasn’t transformed much, and an economy struggling to grow under the weight of inequality it was supposed to fix.

BEE was initially implemented with the aim of levelling the playing field and reducing the stark contrast between ordinary white and black families. Instead, it created a new political oligarchy, where wealth and opportunity circulate among the same well-connected names while millions remain shut out. The policy’s original promise hasn’t disappeared, but it now depends on shifting away from elite share deals and towards genuine skills, entrepreneurship, and most importantly, economic opportunity. Without that reset, equality, prosperity and economic freedom will remain something South Africans talk about, rather than experience.

BioTech for Longevity: Inside the Irish Startup Aerska’s $21M Raise

By Gaia Mambelli

The role which technology plays in longevity is still unfolding. How can technology meaningfully improve people’s lives? Aerska was founded on this question, driving progress in MedTech with a long-term vision. Real impact takes time, but with sustained research, innovation, and commitment, the effects can be life changing.

A new year also brings new plans and ambitions. Aerska, a biotech company headquartered in Dublin, had already laid the groundwork by October 2025. The company closed out the year with a $21M seed round to advance antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates designed to systemically deliver RNA interference (RNAi) medicines to the brain, one of the most ambitious challenges in today’s medicine landscape.
In BioTech, the most powerful goals are those that can change lives. At Aerska, that ambition is already in motion.

Founder’s Track of Records.

Founded by Jack O’Meara, Stuart Milstein, and David Hardwicke, the company is built on extensive expertise in RNA interference (RNAi). This rapidly emerging therapeutic modality precisely silences disease-causing genes and addresses conditions with high levels of unmet medical needs in neurology.


O’Meara, CEO and co-founder of Aerska, had previously led Ochre Biotech; another company focused on RNA-based therapies. The VP, Coughlan; PhD graduate and Foundation Scholar at Trinity College Dublin, had also previously ran a company developing oral drug-delivery technologies. Coughlan later relocated to London, where he continued to deepen his expertise in RNAi mechanisms.


O’Meara is joined by fellow Ochre alumnus David Hardwicke, who serves as Aerska’s Head of Early Development, as well as Mike Perkinton, former Head of Discovery at AstraZeneca Neuroscience. Aerska’s Clinical Development and Operations teams are based in London, which acts as the company’s central hub for the planning, oversight, and execution of its clinical programs.

Aerska’s Delivery Model – “Brain Shuttle” Approach & Patient-Matching and Data Strategy.

Think of Aerska as a delivery model. The brain has a security wall, the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB). While BBB restricts contact with harmful toxins and germs, it simultaneously limits the functionality of most medicines. The difficulty in treating these diseases stems from the inaccessibility of brain cells, as effective drugs must cross the blood–brain barrier to reach targets inside them. Here is where the genetic medicine RNAi comes into play. RNAi works by silencing the genes that cause brain diseases to occur, genes which are bound to certain antibodies in the brain. Such antibodies are better known as “Brain Shuttles”. The medicine shuttles from the bloodstream to the inside of the brain. Once inside, the RNAi medication enters the affected neurons, thus switching off the disease-causing genes and providing aid to the correct part of the body. “We’re pairing this with a strategy to match the intervention to the right patient, at the right stage of their disease”, Jack stated in the Oct. 1 release.

Investment & Post-Seed Growth – Details of the Deal.

Aerska has developed a proprietary delivery system capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB), entering brain cells, and selectively switching off the genes responsible for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. So, what does this mean for the future of the field? This breakthrough approach differentiates the company in a highly competitive BioTech landscape, and is a key reason leading investors to advocate its vision.

Following this, Aerska closed a €17 million seed financing round, co-led by Age1, Backed VC, and Speedinvest, with participation from BlueYard Capital, Lingotto (Exor), Norrsken VC, Kerna Ventures, PsyMed Ventures, and Ada Ventures. This investment round reflects strong investor confidence in Aerska’s science, team, and long-term potential in neurotherapeutic operations.

The Challenge.

BioTech is not an easy business. It operates within one of the most highly regulated environments, shaped by strict laws and compliance requirements. At the same time, patients ultimately depend on the treatments and technologies provided by clinics and healthcare professionals, placing deep trust in the system.


The need for effective neurological solutions has never been more urgent. Aerska addresses some of the most critical neurological illnesses affecting Irish society today. While its R&D work is based in London, the company is headquartered in Dublin to stay close to Ireland’s dynamic innovation ecosystem and its strong network of pharmaceutical and biological players. This setup lets the team tap into top scientific talent on the research side, while positioning the business at the center of a growth-oriented life sciences hub.

Longevity is not a future promise; it is a responsibility. By combining scientific research, a brain-delivery platform, and investors’ trust, Aerska is tackling one of medicine’s most complex challenges head-on. In the fast-aging Irish society with growing neurological need, the company’s long-term commitment to precision RNAi therapies positions it not just to advance MedTech, but to redefine how brain diseases are treated: patient by patient, gene by gene.

US/China AI Wars Escalate as China Effectively Bans Major US Developers.

By Michael Fennell

Prior to the economic, cultural, and seemingly unending prominence of Artificial Intelligence, the US had unequivocal control in chip development. American companies like Intel and AMD dominated the space. But the industry has changed. A company once known for making graphics cards for gaming PCs is now a multi trillion dollar empire on the cutting edge of the most burdening industry in the world.
Nvidia chips have been viewed as an industry flagship with the ability for massive parallel processing, a crucial part of training AI and the execution of AI prompts. What once lay in the gaming PCs now lines server warehouses across the world. And the country of the company who makes them has a big say in who can buy them and when.


China’s Interest in the AI Industry
AI has undoubtedly become a gigantic industry, one which many speculate is not just here to stay, but to change the world. China wants to be the major player in this space for a number of reasons. Most notably the economic growth; if anything akin to the tech boom of the early 2000s, this has the potentiality to create trillions in GDP growth, tens of thousands of jobs, as well as international esteem. Not only is there a positive ambition, but a defensive one too. A reliance on the US in these tumultuous times with fluctuating relations could cause serious trouble for China. But if the roles were reversed, they would have serious bargaining power.


China Battling US Strategy
Despite the excitement around AI, China has a dilemma on their hands. Unfortunately for them the new major chip manufacturer in the space, Nvidia, is another American company. Almost all cutting edge AI technology is being developed and operated with Nvidia at their core. For China, this means that in order to compete in the present, they need to depend on the United States, who are controlling and regulating Nvidia and their exports.


In July the US Commerce secretary took to the media to explain that the US plan to both profit off of China and prevent any AI leapfrogging from them. He stated the only chip they’d be able to buy was the H20, an inferior chip which he repeatedly referred to as the “fourth best”. He said China would become “addicted to the American technology stack” and that this would stifle their domestic innovation, keeping them from the AI mantle both in terms of chips and software.


Whether it was the interview in which the US Commerce secretary made the US economic strategy abundantly clear, or the Chinese government seeing the writing on the wall, they immediately sought to ban all US chips as quickly as possible, preventing all Chinese companies from the future purchase of Nvidia chips. This was something that Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang referred to as “disappointing” in a BBC interview, a comment which was not surprising considering the potential profits Nvidia could have made from a US China arms race with Nvidia in the middle. Now China seeks to develop their own Nvidia, with companies such as Cambricon, one which is working closely with Chinese AI powerhouse Deepseek.

While undoubtedly sub the standard of Nvidia, the prospects of a new chip making powerhouse in the AI space excited investors, thus skyrocketing stock prices. Now seemingly cash rich, it would appear as though the Chinese chip industry is well armed in their race against the US. Even prior to the banning, the Chinese technology company Huawei seemed desperate to catch up to Nvidia in the AI race, massively ramping up funding by billions in the AI chip space.


Consequences for China and the US
In the immediate future, China’s inability to obtain top of the line chips will undoubtedly stifle their ability to adapt and evolve in this ever-emerging industry. Despite backing domestic manufacturers, Deepseek too may take a hit with less access to domestic chips for servers and AI training. Although with their seemingly relentless pursuit from the Chinese government who are providing deregulation to fuel innovation and massive capital investments, a catch up in some way is not out of the realm of possibility. The US opium wars style tactics of dependency against China have failed, but they themselves are also investing heavily in AI both with huge sums of private capital and through the federal government through shared data factories, US AI is being fostered for world domination.


Despite their failure to export to China, the rest of the world seem eager to embrace the top of the line tech, including the UAE who recently secured a billion dollar a year investment agreement with the US for the securing of Nvidia chips.

« Older Entries